AI Product
Decision Support
Value Proposition

Manual synthesis delays portfolio decisions

An AI layer that scans the market and shows news signals based on portfolio holdings.

Starting point
New feature, value proposition
Team
Designer, PM, 2 engineers
Timeline
Two months
Autonomous signal analysis view
Outcomes
70%

signals rated helpful

1 in 3

helpful signals led to a trade decision

Problem

The Cognitive Bottleneck

A hedge fund portfolio manager starts the day by finding out why their holdings moved overnight. The reason determines what they do next — buy more, sell some, or leave it alone. It arrives in pieces, across separate sources, and assembling it happens entirely in the user's head. The chance to act passes while the picture is still forming.

Discovery

The engine would produce more signals than anyone can read, so it filters the way managers already do — by ticker

1Managers won't act on a signal they can't trace. They need the source and the calculation behind it, not the conclusion.

2Managers filter by entity first. Every interview surfaced the same order: ticker, then portfolio, then source. Time stays the default ordering underneath.

3Engineering projected ~90 signals per ticker, per day — 3,000+ across a book. No mailbox survives that. The model had to be a feed filtered by need, not an inbox cleared by hand.

Ideation

AI surfaces, the manager reads, the AI answers what they ask

1Separate the fact from the read, and name the source on the card. The first check happens on the card; the article is one click out.

Rejected: evidence on a separate view. It put the check further away than the conclusion.

2Order one feed by priority, and keep the home page a glance. Route investigation to its own page.

Rejected: severity tabs with counts. Counts invite clearing, a feed invites reading.

3Filter by ticker from the top bar, over a feed that is already populated.

Rejected: an empty feed the manager fills by choosing a ticker. A blank starting state reads as a system waiting for input, not one that ran overnight.

Solution #1

The signal has to be checkable before the manager will act on it

Signal card annotated with source attribution and fact vs. interpretation, above the signal analysis view that suggests checking the read
Solution #2

The morning question splits in two: what changed, and why

Each block shows enough to decide whether to open it. Detail is one click down, so the page stays scannable.

Home page annotated: what changed overnight (portfolio summary) and why it changed (Autonomous feed)

Clicking a signal moves from the "scan and read" state into the full investigation:

Filter by ticker from the top bar, over a feed that is already populated.

Solution #3

The manager opens a signal only after deciding it's worth opening

Most signals stop at the first step. Moving on is the common case and opening is the exception, which is what the three steps are shaped around.

Scan — no tap. The collapsed card shows the headline, the source, and the synthesized sentence.

Read — one tap. The chevron expands the card to the full read, in place.

Ask — one more tap. The chat opens with the signal still on screen. One of the suggested questions is “How does this affect my portfolios?”

Outcomes
70%

signals rated helpful

1 in 3

helpful signals led to a trade decision

Why Interviews Weren't Enough

Interviews revealed wants, not needs.

Accuracy was the real need — assumed, never asked for, because it's a given when reading the news manually.

Olga Faktor • Built with Claude Code • 2026